<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 622 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263954</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed both appeals, setting aside the duty demands on the grounds of the goods being exported under bond and no discrepancy found between the documents. The tribunal concluded that there was no evidence of two sets of goods being manufactured, and the duty demand was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 622 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263954</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed both appeals, setting aside the duty demands on the grounds of the goods being exported under bond and no discrepancy found between the documents. The tribunal concluded that there was no evidence of two sets of goods being manufactured, and the duty demand was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>