<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 615 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263947</link>
    <description>The government upheld the decision of the appellate authority, allowing the respondent to claim the higher drawback rate for export goods despite discrepancies in quality assessment and classification. The Revision Application filed by the department was rejected due to the lack of substantial evidence proving the goods were not of prime quality.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 615 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263947</link>
      <description>The government upheld the decision of the appellate authority, allowing the respondent to claim the higher drawback rate for export goods despite discrepancies in quality assessment and classification. The Revision Application filed by the department was rejected due to the lack of substantial evidence proving the goods were not of prime quality.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>