<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 613 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263945</link>
    <description>The Court held that the Assessee was eligible for the exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act as he did not own another residential house on the relevant date. The Court also determined that the gains from the sale of shares were long-term capital gains. The appeal was dismissed with no orders as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 613 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263945</link>
      <description>The Court held that the Assessee was eligible for the exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act as he did not own another residential house on the relevant date. The Court also determined that the gains from the sale of shares were long-term capital gains. The appeal was dismissed with no orders as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>