<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 605 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263937</link>
    <description>The Tribunal restricted the disallowance under section 14A to the amount voluntarily disallowed by the appellant, deleting the additional disallowance made by the Assessing Officer. The decision was based on the lack of nexus between certain expenses and the exempt income, as well as the AO&#039;s failure to provide sufficient reasoning for the disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 06:57:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 605 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263937</link>
      <description>The Tribunal restricted the disallowance under section 14A to the amount voluntarily disallowed by the appellant, deleting the additional disallowance made by the Assessing Officer. The decision was based on the lack of nexus between certain expenses and the exempt income, as well as the AO&#039;s failure to provide sufficient reasoning for the disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>