<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 5 - CESTAT (MUMBAI)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240</link>
    <description>The Tribunal waived the penalty of Rs. 7,105 imposed under Section 76 for late payment of Service Tax, citing the absence of mala fide intention and the appellants&#039; timely payment of the tax. However, the penalty of Rs. 1,000 under Section 77 for late filing of ST-3 Returns was upheld. The appellants&#039; appeal was successful in reducing the overall penalty amount, providing relief on the penalty for late payment of Service Tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 10:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 5 - CESTAT (MUMBAI)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240</link>
      <description>The Tribunal waived the penalty of Rs. 7,105 imposed under Section 76 for late payment of Service Tax, citing the absence of mala fide intention and the appellants&#039; timely payment of the tax. However, the penalty of Rs. 1,000 under Section 77 for late filing of ST-3 Returns was upheld. The appellants&#039; appeal was successful in reducing the overall penalty amount, providing relief on the penalty for late payment of Service Tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>