https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239 The court held that services provided by an architect as a valuer of immovable property do not fall under the category of "Consulting Engineer" for service tax purposes. The appellant, being an architect and not a consulting engineer, was found not liable for service tax under the Finance Act, 1994. The decision set aside the order confirming the demand under Consulting Engineer services and allowed the appeal. en-us Mon, 22 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239 The court held that services provided by an architect as a valuer of immovable property do not fall under the category of "Consulting Engineer" for service tax purposes. The appellant, being an architect and not a consulting engineer, was found not liable for service tax under the Finance Act, 1994. The decision set aside the order confirming the demand under Consulting Engineer services and allowed the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 22 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239