<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 600 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173329</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the convictions and sentences imposed by the lower courts for offences under Sections 364, 396, and 120B IPC. The Court confirmed compliance with Section 306 Cr.P.C. regarding the approver&#039;s pardon and examination, finding no illegality in the procedure adopted. Additionally, the Court determined that the accomplice&#039;s testimony was adequately corroborated, supporting the conviction of the accused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2015 21:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 600 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173329</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the convictions and sentences imposed by the lower courts for offences under Sections 364, 396, and 120B IPC. The Court confirmed compliance with Section 306 Cr.P.C. regarding the approver&#039;s pardon and examination, finding no illegality in the procedure adopted. Additionally, the Court determined that the accomplice&#039;s testimony was adequately corroborated, supporting the conviction of the accused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>