<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 755 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173327</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed regarding the eligibility for credit on the service tax amount paid for Group Mediclaim Policy and Group Personal Accident Policy. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order based on a previous decision, allowing the appeal with consequential relief. The issue of quantification of service tax paid towards the Group Insurance Policy of permitted family members was deemed necessary for further discussion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2015 12:48:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 755 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173327</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed regarding the eligibility for credit on the service tax amount paid for Group Mediclaim Policy and Group Personal Accident Policy. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order based on a previous decision, allowing the appeal with consequential relief. The issue of quantification of service tax paid towards the Group Insurance Policy of permitted family members was deemed necessary for further discussion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>