<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (2) TMI 69 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173322</link>
    <description>The High Court found that the Tribunal erred in applying Section 8(3) of the Excess Profits Tax Act, directing a re-evaluation of the case to determine the nature and continuity of the business. The issue of depreciation was deferred pending clarification on whether there was a succession to the business or if it was a new business. The High Court stressed the importance of the Tribunal considering all relevant evidence in its re-assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2015 12:02:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (2) TMI 69 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173322</link>
      <description>The High Court found that the Tribunal erred in applying Section 8(3) of the Excess Profits Tax Act, directing a re-evaluation of the case to determine the nature and continuity of the business. The issue of depreciation was deferred pending clarification on whether there was a succession to the business or if it was a new business. The High Court stressed the importance of the Tribunal considering all relevant evidence in its re-assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>