https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173321 The High Court upheld the decisions of lower authorities in favor of the Respondent, dismissing the Revenue's petition challenging the rejection of rebate claims. The Court ruled that duty payment upon export by the Respondent was sufficient, and technical lapses like the missing signature should not invalidate the rebate claims. The petition was dismissed, and the rule discharged with no order as to costs. en-us Wed, 07 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Dec 2018 18:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173321 The High Court upheld the decisions of lower authorities in favor of the Respondent, dismissing the Revenue's petition challenging the rejection of rebate claims. The Court ruled that duty payment upon export by the Respondent was sufficient, and technical lapses like the missing signature should not invalidate the rebate claims. The petition was dismissed, and the rule discharged with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 07 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173321