https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173319 Zonal food-quality standards for ghee framed under delegated rule-making were upheld as valid where they were based on expert consideration and supported by a statutory classification. A challenge under Article 14 on grounds of discrimination or unreasonableness requires proper pleadings and proof of material facts showing that the classification is infirm; absent such evidence, the Court will not substitute its own view for the standards fixed by the rule-making authority. The respondent produced no evidence to displace the presumption of validity, and the High Court was not justified in ignoring the prescribed zonal standards or applying the lowest Reichert value used anywhere in the country. en-us Thu, 06 Feb 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:57:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173319 Zonal food-quality standards for ghee framed under delegated rule-making were upheld as valid where they were based on expert consideration and supported by a statutory classification. A challenge under Article 14 on grounds of discrimination or unreasonableness requires proper pleadings and proof of material facts showing that the classification is infirm; absent such evidence, the Court will not substitute its own view for the standards fixed by the rule-making authority. The respondent produced no evidence to displace the presumption of validity, and the High Court was not justified in ignoring the prescribed zonal standards or applying the lowest Reichert value used anywhere in the country. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 Feb 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173319