<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1380 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173316</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s decision to impose a penalty of Rs. 15 lakhs each on the petitioners, a registered partnership firm in the business of paints. The Court found that the Commission had provided adequate reasons for the penalty amount and rejected the petitioners&#039; arguments for rectification. Additionally, the Court ruled that since the earlier orders were already challenged, a fresh petition on the same matter was not maintainable. Therefore, the High Court dismissed the petition, affirming the Settlement Commission&#039;s penalty imposition on the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1380 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173316</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s decision to impose a penalty of Rs. 15 lakhs each on the petitioners, a registered partnership firm in the business of paints. The Court found that the Commission had provided adequate reasons for the penalty amount and rejected the petitioners&#039; arguments for rectification. Additionally, the Court ruled that since the earlier orders were already challenged, a fresh petition on the same matter was not maintainable. Therefore, the High Court dismissed the petition, affirming the Settlement Commission&#039;s penalty imposition on the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>