https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173314 The High Court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory remedies before resorting to writ jurisdiction. The Court cited precedents and highlighted the discretionary power of the High Court to grant relief under Article 226, reiterating that statutory remedies should be preferred unless fundamental rights or jurisdictional issues are involved. The petitioner was advised to pursue the return of the tribunal's order copy after obtaining a photocopy, underscoring the importance of exhausting alternative remedies before seeking relief through writ jurisdiction. en-us Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173314 The High Court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory remedies before resorting to writ jurisdiction. The Court cited precedents and highlighted the discretionary power of the High Court to grant relief under Article 226, reiterating that statutory remedies should be preferred unless fundamental rights or jurisdictional issues are involved. The petitioner was advised to pursue the return of the tribunal's order copy after obtaining a photocopy, underscoring the importance of exhausting alternative remedies before seeking relief through writ jurisdiction. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173314