<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 599 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173310</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Ext. P6 order issued by the Commissioner of Income-tax under section 264, confirming the disallowance of cash payments exceeding Rs. 10,000 under section 40A(3). The court ruled that the exception under rule 6DD(a) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, applies only to payments made directly to specified institutions, not to payments made to accounts maintained in those institutions. Additionally, the court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s argument regarding cash remittances through truck drivers, as it was not pursued before the Commissioner. Consequently, the petition was found to be without merit and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 599 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173310</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Ext. P6 order issued by the Commissioner of Income-tax under section 264, confirming the disallowance of cash payments exceeding Rs. 10,000 under section 40A(3). The court ruled that the exception under rule 6DD(a) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, applies only to payments made directly to specified institutions, not to payments made to accounts maintained in those institutions. Additionally, the court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s argument regarding cash remittances through truck drivers, as it was not pursued before the Commissioner. Consequently, the petition was found to be without merit and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>