<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (5) TMI 18 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173308</link>
    <description>The court clarified that provident fund money is exempt from attachment and execution, including through the appointment of a receiver, due to statutory provisions and public policy considerations. However, arrears of salary and allowances do not enjoy the same exemption and can be subject to execution. The appeal was allowed, and the lower court&#039;s order appointing a receiver for the Provident Fund amount was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2015 10:51:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (5) TMI 18 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173308</link>
      <description>The court clarified that provident fund money is exempt from attachment and execution, including through the appointment of a receiver, due to statutory provisions and public policy considerations. However, arrears of salary and allowances do not enjoy the same exemption and can be subject to execution. The appeal was allowed, and the lower court&#039;s order appointing a receiver for the Provident Fund amount was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>