<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 442 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173307</link>
    <description>Electricity arrears under the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 are attributable to the consumer who incurred them and do not create a statutory charge on the premises. The electricity board may discontinue supply for non-payment by the defaulting consumer, but it cannot fasten that past contractual liability on a bona fide auction purchaser of a mortgaged industrial unit. Reconnection cannot be made conditional on payment of the predecessor&#039;s arrears unless statute expressly imposes such liability. Where the facts show continuity of the same entity, the purchaser&#039;s liability may still arise on those facts, but not merely because the premises earlier received supply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2015 10:38:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 442 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173307</link>
      <description>Electricity arrears under the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 are attributable to the consumer who incurred them and do not create a statutory charge on the premises. The electricity board may discontinue supply for non-payment by the defaulting consumer, but it cannot fasten that past contractual liability on a bona fide auction purchaser of a mortgaged industrial unit. Reconnection cannot be made conditional on payment of the predecessor&#039;s arrears unless statute expressly imposes such liability. Where the facts show continuity of the same entity, the purchaser&#039;s liability may still arise on those facts, but not merely because the premises earlier received supply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>