<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 442 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173307</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that auction purchasers are not liable for the electricity dues of previous owners in cases such as Waxpol Industries, Suman Packaging, Abhay Kumar, and North East Fertilizers. However, in the case of Isha Marbles, the judgment was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with costs. The Court emphasized that auction purchasers should not be burdened with the liabilities of previous consumers unless there is a specific clause stating otherwise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2015 10:38:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 442 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173307</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that auction purchasers are not liable for the electricity dues of previous owners in cases such as Waxpol Industries, Suman Packaging, Abhay Kumar, and North East Fertilizers. However, in the case of Isha Marbles, the judgment was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with costs. The Court emphasized that auction purchasers should not be burdened with the liabilities of previous consumers unless there is a specific clause stating otherwise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>