<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 578 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263910</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned proceedings for lack of a show-cause notice as required by a circular. Emphasizing the importance of providing an opportunity for the petitioner to respond before imposing a penalty, the court directed the respondent to issue a notice within two weeks, allowing the petitioner to submit an explanation. The respondent was instructed to consider the explanation and proceed accordingly, ensuring a personal hearing. The court quashed the impugned orders, directing the petitioner to treat them as show-cause notices and submit a reply within three weeks. The writ petitions were allowed, with no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2015 07:45:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 578 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263910</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned proceedings for lack of a show-cause notice as required by a circular. Emphasizing the importance of providing an opportunity for the petitioner to respond before imposing a penalty, the court directed the respondent to issue a notice within two weeks, allowing the petitioner to submit an explanation. The respondent was instructed to consider the explanation and proceed accordingly, ensuring a personal hearing. The court quashed the impugned orders, directing the petitioner to treat them as show-cause notices and submit a reply within three weeks. The writ petitions were allowed, with no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>