<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 17 - CESTAT (BANGALORE)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=223</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, determining that their primary activity of producing TV serials did not constitute acting as an advertising agency. The appellant provided substantial evidence, including a Registration Certificate and balance sheet, supporting their claim. The Tribunal set aside the previous orders and remanded the matter for further consideration, directing a speaking order after affording the appellants an opportunity to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 17 - CESTAT (BANGALORE)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=223</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, determining that their primary activity of producing TV serials did not constitute acting as an advertising agency. The appellant provided substantial evidence, including a Registration Certificate and balance sheet, supporting their claim. The Tribunal set aside the previous orders and remanded the matter for further consideration, directing a speaking order after affording the appellants an opportunity to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>