https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263902 The Criminal Original Petitions were allowed, resulting in the quashing of proceedings in E.O.C.C.Nos.102, 99, 98, 100, 101 of 2009. The respondent was granted liberty to commence fresh action against the partnership firm alongside the partners, provided it complies with legal provisions. The court emphasized the necessity of impleading the partnership firm in prosecutions, citing relevant statutory provisions, and rejected the argument that the petitioner could not benefit from a subsequent Supreme Court ruling. en-us Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Sep 2017 11:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263902 The Criminal Original Petitions were allowed, resulting in the quashing of proceedings in E.O.C.C.Nos.102, 99, 98, 100, 101 of 2009. The respondent was granted liberty to commence fresh action against the partnership firm alongside the partners, provided it complies with legal provisions. The court emphasized the necessity of impleading the partnership firm in prosecutions, citing relevant statutory provisions, and rejected the argument that the petitioner could not benefit from a subsequent Supreme Court ruling. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263902