<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 568 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263900</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the appellant must deposit 7.5% of the duty demanded to maintain the appeal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. As the appellant failed to comply, the appeal was deemed not maintainable. However, the Tribunal granted a two-week extension for the deposit, emphasizing adherence to procedural requirements and statutory provisions while allowing fairness in the process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 568 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263900</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the appellant must deposit 7.5% of the duty demanded to maintain the appeal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. As the appellant failed to comply, the appeal was deemed not maintainable. However, the Tribunal granted a two-week extension for the deposit, emphasizing adherence to procedural requirements and statutory provisions while allowing fairness in the process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>