<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 555 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263887</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal. Certain companies were excluded from the list of comparables, the inclusion of additional depreciation in operating costs was to be re-examined, contingent telecom expenses were excluded from operating costs, and the deduction under Section 10A was allowed without setting off brought forward losses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 555 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263887</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal. Certain companies were excluded from the list of comparables, the inclusion of additional depreciation in operating costs was to be re-examined, contingent telecom expenses were excluded from operating costs, and the deduction under Section 10A was allowed without setting off brought forward losses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>