<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 548 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263880</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,66,30,000/-, confirming that the donations were not anonymous and that Section 68 was not applicable. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee had sufficiently proven the identity and capacity of the donors and had applied the donations for charitable purposes, thereby complying with the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 548 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263880</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,66,30,000/-, confirming that the donations were not anonymous and that Section 68 was not applicable. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee had sufficiently proven the identity and capacity of the donors and had applied the donations for charitable purposes, thereby complying with the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>