<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 546 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263878</link>
    <description>Interest earned by a co-operative society from deposits placed with co-operative banks qualifies for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) because the phrase &quot;investments with any other co-operative society&quot; was treated as wide enough to include deposits with a co-operative bank, absent an express statutory exclusion. The reasoning rejected a narrow distinction between investments and deposits and treated a co-operative bank as a co-operative society for this purpose. The ruling also confined Totgars to its facts, where the amount was a liability payable to members rather than surplus funds temporarily parked. On that basis, interest arising from surplus funds was held deductible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2015 07:42:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 546 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263878</link>
      <description>Interest earned by a co-operative society from deposits placed with co-operative banks qualifies for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) because the phrase &quot;investments with any other co-operative society&quot; was treated as wide enough to include deposits with a co-operative bank, absent an express statutory exclusion. The reasoning rejected a narrow distinction between investments and deposits and treated a co-operative bank as a co-operative society for this purpose. The ruling also confined Totgars to its facts, where the amount was a liability payable to members rather than surplus funds temporarily parked. On that basis, interest arising from surplus funds was held deductible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>