<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 544 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263876</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed both the assessee&#039;s and revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the decisions on disallowances under section 14A, ESI contribution deduction, and interest expenditure for mutual fund investments. The disallowance under section 14A related to exempt dividend income earned from mutual funds was upheld, emphasizing the applicability of Rule 8D(2)(ii) without requiring a direct link between expenditure and investments. Additionally, the allowance of ESI contribution deduction was supported based on timely remittance to the government account, and the disallowance of interest expenditure for mutual fund investments was overturned due to the lack of evidence linking borrowed funds to investments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2015 07:42:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 544 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263876</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed both the assessee&#039;s and revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the decisions on disallowances under section 14A, ESI contribution deduction, and interest expenditure for mutual fund investments. The disallowance under section 14A related to exempt dividend income earned from mutual funds was upheld, emphasizing the applicability of Rule 8D(2)(ii) without requiring a direct link between expenditure and investments. Additionally, the allowance of ESI contribution deduction was supported based on timely remittance to the government account, and the disallowance of interest expenditure for mutual fund investments was overturned due to the lack of evidence linking borrowed funds to investments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>