<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 537 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263869</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders of the assessing officer for various assessment years, remitting the issues back for reconsideration. For the suppression of sales issue, the Tribunal found evidence of sales without proper documentation, directing a fresh examination. The addition for the assessment year 2008-09 was confirmed based on suppressed sales, with the Tribunal remitting the issue back for consistency. Regarding the credit received, the Tribunal allowed the taxpayer another opportunity to prove the genuineness of the gift, remitting the issue for a fresh examination. All appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing a comprehensive review of evidence and fair opportunities for the taxpayer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2015 07:41:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 537 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263869</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders of the assessing officer for various assessment years, remitting the issues back for reconsideration. For the suppression of sales issue, the Tribunal found evidence of sales without proper documentation, directing a fresh examination. The addition for the assessment year 2008-09 was confirmed based on suppressed sales, with the Tribunal remitting the issue back for consistency. Regarding the credit received, the Tribunal allowed the taxpayer another opportunity to prove the genuineness of the gift, remitting the issue for a fresh examination. All appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing a comprehensive review of evidence and fair opportunities for the taxpayer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>