<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 15 - CESTAT (CHENNAI)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219</link>
    <description>SC upheld penalties for delayed service tax payment between 1999-2001. Tribunal rejected assessee&#039;s claim of financial hardship as reasonable cause under Section 76 and Section 80 of Finance Act, 1994. Original penalties equivalent to service tax amounts were reinstated, with the court ruling that involvement with unlawful entities does not justify penalty reduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 15 - CESTAT (CHENNAI)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219</link>
      <description>SC upheld penalties for delayed service tax payment between 1999-2001. Tribunal rejected assessee&#039;s claim of financial hardship as reasonable cause under Section 76 and Section 80 of Finance Act, 1994. Original penalties equivalent to service tax amounts were reinstated, with the court ruling that involvement with unlawful entities does not justify penalty reduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>