<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 549 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173301</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the dispute to the Industrial Tribunal to determine if the establishment qualifies as an &quot;industry&quot; under the Industrial Disputes Act. The Tribunal decided to address all issues together, including the preliminary matter, to prevent delays in resolving the dispute. The High Court affirmed this approach, dismissing the appeal without costs and emphasizing the importance of avoiding undue delays in industrial dispute resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:53:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 549 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173301</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the dispute to the Industrial Tribunal to determine if the establishment qualifies as an &quot;industry&quot; under the Industrial Disputes Act. The Tribunal decided to address all issues together, including the preliminary matter, to prevent delays in resolving the dispute. The High Court affirmed this approach, dismissing the appeal without costs and emphasizing the importance of avoiding undue delays in industrial dispute resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>