<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 3 - CESTAT (NEW DELHI)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT (New Delhi) waived the pre-deposit and stayed recovery of Service tax of Rs. 2,28,533 pending appeal for the period July 2001 to August 2002 by the appellants, who were acting as clearing and forwarding agents for M/s. Cipla Ltd. The Tribunal found merit in their argument that they are not liable for Service Tax based on a precedent, scheduling the appeal for regular hearing on 14-1-2005.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 3 - CESTAT (NEW DELHI)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT (New Delhi) waived the pre-deposit and stayed recovery of Service tax of Rs. 2,28,533 pending appeal for the period July 2001 to August 2002 by the appellants, who were acting as clearing and forwarding agents for M/s. Cipla Ltd. The Tribunal found merit in their argument that they are not liable for Service Tax based on a precedent, scheduling the appeal for regular hearing on 14-1-2005.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>