<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 7 - CESTAT (NEW DELHI)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed against an adjudication order confirming Service Tax demand and penalty. The Tribunal held that the show cause notice issued under Section 73 after the Revalidation Act is not maintainable. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 12:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 7 - CESTAT (NEW DELHI)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed against an adjudication order confirming Service Tax demand and penalty. The Tribunal held that the show cause notice issued under Section 73 after the Revalidation Act is not maintainable. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>