<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 938 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173291</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition by Mr. S.K. Sarwal, Advocate, against Ms. Avinish Ahlawat, Advocate, after the respondent withdrew the compulsory audit order under the Delhi Value Added Tax, 2004. The petition was resolved with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:42:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 938 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173291</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition by Mr. S.K. Sarwal, Advocate, against Ms. Avinish Ahlawat, Advocate, after the respondent withdrew the compulsory audit order under the Delhi Value Added Tax, 2004. The petition was resolved with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>