<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 14 - CESTAT (MUMBAI)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214</link>
    <description>Where service tax is assessed provisionally under the applicable rules, the actual tax liability is determined only on finalisation of the assessment, and interest cannot be charged before that point. The incorporated provisional assessment mechanism under the Central Excise Rules did not alter this position. The demand for differential interest was therefore unsustainable, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 14 - CESTAT (MUMBAI)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214</link>
      <description>Where service tax is assessed provisionally under the applicable rules, the actual tax liability is determined only on finalisation of the assessment, and interest cannot be charged before that point. The incorporated provisional assessment mechanism under the Central Excise Rules did not alter this position. The demand for differential interest was therefore unsustainable, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>