<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 842 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173290</link>
    <description>A Supreme Court civil appeal in a Central Excise dispute (Commissioner v. Pushpaman Forgings) is recorded by citation; the court issued an order dismissing the appeal. The document identifies the bench and provides the operative outcome-civil appeal number 3387 of 2002 was dismissed-without further reasoning or substantive legal analysis in the supplied text. No additional statutory interpretation, factual findings, or legal principles are set out in the excerpt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:32:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 842 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173290</link>
      <description>A Supreme Court civil appeal in a Central Excise dispute (Commissioner v. Pushpaman Forgings) is recorded by citation; the court issued an order dismissing the appeal. The document identifies the bench and provides the operative outcome-civil appeal number 3387 of 2002 was dismissed-without further reasoning or substantive legal analysis in the supplied text. No additional statutory interpretation, factual findings, or legal principles are set out in the excerpt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>