<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 713 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173287</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the tax case appeal, upholding the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to disallow the claim of loss in the chit fund account. It was held that the loss incurred by subscribing to a chit was not allowable as a business loss, as it did not have a direct connection to the appellant&#039;s interior decoration business. The Court found no substantial question of law involved in the appeal and affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:49:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 713 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173287</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the tax case appeal, upholding the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to disallow the claim of loss in the chit fund account. It was held that the loss incurred by subscribing to a chit was not allowable as a business loss, as it did not have a direct connection to the appellant&#039;s interior decoration business. The Court found no substantial question of law involved in the appeal and affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>