https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173282 The Supreme Court examined the legality of considering previous detention orders in forming subjective satisfaction for the current order. Referring to relevant case law, the Court emphasized that the inclusion of previous grounds of detention, even if quashed, could vitiate the current order. The Court found the vagueness of statements in the grounds of detention problematic, as they hindered effective representation by the detenu. Ultimately, the Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned detention order and directing the release of the petitioner. en-us Thu, 27 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:15:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173282 The Supreme Court examined the legality of considering previous detention orders in forming subjective satisfaction for the current order. Referring to relevant case law, the Court emphasized that the inclusion of previous grounds of detention, even if quashed, could vitiate the current order. The Court found the vagueness of statements in the grounds of detention problematic, as they hindered effective representation by the detenu. Ultimately, the Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned detention order and directing the release of the petitioner. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173282