https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173278 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the deed from 1894 was a lease, not a mortgage. The document's provisions for fixed rent and lack of property transfer for debt security indicated a lease agreement. The court emphasized determining the parties' predominant intention when faced with mixed elements. Justices GOSWAMI, P.K., CHANDRACHUD, Y.V., & GUPTA, A.C., JJ., delivered the judgment without providing separate opinions. en-us Wed, 22 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:24:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173278 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the deed from 1894 was a lease, not a mortgage. The document's provisions for fixed rent and lack of property transfer for debt security indicated a lease agreement. The court emphasized determining the parties' predominant intention when faced with mixed elements. Justices GOSWAMI, P.K., CHANDRACHUD, Y.V., & GUPTA, A.C., JJ., delivered the judgment without providing separate opinions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173278