https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173276 Fraud vitiates all judicial acts, so an order obtained by suppression of material facts or misrepresentation remains a nullity and may be recalled despite earlier dismissal of special leave petitions and the doctrine of merger. The High Court's recall of the earlier judgment was therefore upheld, as finality could not protect a fraudulent order. On the ceiling-law issue, the Court treated the State's suo motu revisional action as not barred by delay where the earlier factual basis was shown to be false or incomplete, and the land was not excluded from reconsideration on the asserted possession narrative. Fresh consideration by the authorities was sustained. en-us Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jul 2016 11:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173276 Fraud vitiates all judicial acts, so an order obtained by suppression of material facts or misrepresentation remains a nullity and may be recalled despite earlier dismissal of special leave petitions and the doctrine of merger. The High Court's recall of the earlier judgment was therefore upheld, as finality could not protect a fraudulent order. On the ceiling-law issue, the Court treated the State's suo motu revisional action as not barred by delay where the earlier factual basis was shown to be false or incomplete, and the land was not excluded from reconsideration on the asserted possession narrative. Fresh consideration by the authorities was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173276