https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173276 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to recall its earlier judgment due to fraud by the landowners, emphasizing that judgments obtained by fraud are nullities. The disputed land was found to be subject to the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, despite the landowners' claims. The Court deemed the State Government's exercise of revisional powers justified in light of fraudulent activities. The case was remanded for fresh consideration under the relevant laws, dismissing the appellants' arguments and directing completion of proceedings with adherence to legal principles. Appeals were dismissed with costs. en-us Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Jul 2016 11:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173276 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to recall its earlier judgment due to fraud by the landowners, emphasizing that judgments obtained by fraud are nullities. The disputed land was found to be subject to the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, despite the landowners' claims. The Court deemed the State Government's exercise of revisional powers justified in light of fraudulent activities. The case was remanded for fresh consideration under the relevant laws, dismissing the appellants' arguments and directing completion of proceedings with adherence to legal principles. Appeals were dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173276