https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173273 The appellant was acquitted of the charge under section 27 (a) (i) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act due to lack of evidence proving the essential elements of the offense. However, the conviction under section 28 for refusal to disclose the source of the tablets was upheld, with the sentence reduced to time served. The fine of Rs. 200 was maintained under section 28, and the appellant was ordered to pay it within a month. The appeal was allowed in part, leading to the appellant's immediate release. en-us Wed, 17 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Sep 2015 13:05:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173273 The appellant was acquitted of the charge under section 27 (a) (i) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act due to lack of evidence proving the essential elements of the offense. However, the conviction under section 28 for refusal to disclose the source of the tablets was upheld, with the sentence reduced to time served. The fine of Rs. 200 was maintained under section 28, and the appellant was ordered to pay it within a month. The appeal was allowed in part, leading to the appellant's immediate release. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173273