https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173264 The Supreme Court declined to interfere under Article 136 where the Tribunal's findings of fact had not been disturbed by the High Court, and therefore no notice was issued. The order reflects the settled principle that the Court will ordinarily not exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction to reopen concurrent or unchallenged factual findings in central excise matters, and the special leave petition was dismissed on that basis. en-us Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:51:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173264 The Supreme Court declined to interfere under Article 136 where the Tribunal's findings of fact had not been disturbed by the High Court, and therefore no notice was issued. The order reflects the settled principle that the Court will ordinarily not exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction to reopen concurrent or unchallenged factual findings in central excise matters, and the special leave petition was dismissed on that basis. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173264