https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173256 The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the orders of the competent authority and the Appellate Tribunal. It held that the respondents failed to follow the procedural requirements under SAFEMA and did not adequately disprove the petitioner's claims of legitimate acquisition of the properties. The court emphasized the necessity of a thorough and fair inquiry, utilizing the powers vested under SAFEMA, to ensure justice and adherence to legal standards. en-us Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:20:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173256 The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the orders of the competent authority and the Appellate Tribunal. It held that the respondents failed to follow the procedural requirements under SAFEMA and did not adequately disprove the petitioner's claims of legitimate acquisition of the properties. The court emphasized the necessity of a thorough and fair inquiry, utilizing the powers vested under SAFEMA, to ensure justice and adherence to legal standards. Case-Laws FEMA Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173256