<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 598 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173255</link>
    <description>Administrative action affecting mining lease rights must comply with natural justice where the cancellation and revisional orders rely on factual material not fully disclosed to the affected party. The Court indicated that the proper course was not final restoration of the lease, but remittal for fresh notice setting out the factual basis, supply of relied-upon documents, and an opportunity to file objections and be heard before the revisional authority. It also required consideration of the intervening lessee&#039;s claim and whether the alleged breaches were attributable to the original lessee or another person. The matter was remitted for a reasoned decision, with status quo maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:04:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 598 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173255</link>
      <description>Administrative action affecting mining lease rights must comply with natural justice where the cancellation and revisional orders rely on factual material not fully disclosed to the affected party. The Court indicated that the proper course was not final restoration of the lease, but remittal for fresh notice setting out the factual basis, supply of relied-upon documents, and an opportunity to file objections and be heard before the revisional authority. It also required consideration of the intervening lessee&#039;s claim and whether the alleged breaches were attributable to the original lessee or another person. The matter was remitted for a reasoned decision, with status quo maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>