<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 534 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263866</link>
    <description>The judgment allowed the appeal, directing the primary adjudicating authority to process the refund claim based on the electronic filing date of 5.7.2012. The decision emphasized the significance of adhering to the statutory time limits for refund claims under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and underscored the binding nature of legal precedents in interpreting such provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 534 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263866</link>
      <description>The judgment allowed the appeal, directing the primary adjudicating authority to process the refund claim based on the electronic filing date of 5.7.2012. The decision emphasized the significance of adhering to the statutory time limits for refund claims under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and underscored the binding nature of legal precedents in interpreting such provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>