<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 529 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263861</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by remanding the case to the Adjudicating Authority, setting aside the first appellate authority&#039;s decision. The Tribunal found the appellant had submitted sufficient evidence of service tax payments, supporting their refund claim under Notification No. 9/2009-ST. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to review the duty paying documents provided and sanction the refund claim after verification, granting the appellant a personal hearing opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:00:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 529 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263861</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by remanding the case to the Adjudicating Authority, setting aside the first appellate authority&#039;s decision. The Tribunal found the appellant had submitted sufficient evidence of service tax payments, supporting their refund claim under Notification No. 9/2009-ST. The Adjudicating Authority was directed to review the duty paying documents provided and sanction the refund claim after verification, granting the appellant a personal hearing opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>