<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 525 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263857</link>
    <description>A corrected C form that had been returned for incomplete particulars could be resubmitted for verification by the assessing authority. The petitioner stated that the defects had been cured and sought consequential tax benefit on reprocessing of the form; the State did not oppose that course. The authority was directed to verify the resubmitted form for authenticity and to grant the benefit if it was found to be in order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 07:59:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 525 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263857</link>
      <description>A corrected C form that had been returned for incomplete particulars could be resubmitted for verification by the assessing authority. The petitioner stated that the defects had been cured and sought consequential tax benefit on reprocessing of the form; the State did not oppose that course. The authority was directed to verify the resubmitted form for authenticity and to grant the benefit if it was found to be in order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>