<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 524 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263856</link>
    <description>Penalty under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act was unsustainable because a pre-assessment payment made by cheque was ignored in computing the balance demand and consequential penalty. The reassessment also applied a higher turnover-tax rate despite reliance on a notification prescribing a lower rate for iron and steel. Reliance on non-filing of Form 32B was misplaced because the proviso underpinning that requirement had been omitted before the relevant assessment year. The revisional order was therefore liable to be set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 07:59:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 524 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263856</link>
      <description>Penalty under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act was unsustainable because a pre-assessment payment made by cheque was ignored in computing the balance demand and consequential penalty. The reassessment also applied a higher turnover-tax rate despite reliance on a notification prescribing a lower rate for iron and steel. Reliance on non-filing of Form 32B was misplaced because the proviso underpinning that requirement had been omitted before the relevant assessment year. The revisional order was therefore liable to be set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>