https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263840 A quasi-judicial order in an oppression and mismanagement matter was held vulnerable to challenge where substantial issues on maintainability, alteration of articles, board resolutions, valuation, and related conduct were not properly examined or were dealt with in brief conclusions. The court emphasised that such proceedings require transparent, reasoned, and issue-responsive decision-making, especially where the forum exercises wide powers but must remain within jurisdictional limits. Because the order reflected inadequate reasoning and an incomplete fact-finding exercise, it was set aside and the company petitions were restored for fresh decision on merits. en-us Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Sep 2015 07:53:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263840 A quasi-judicial order in an oppression and mismanagement matter was held vulnerable to challenge where substantial issues on maintainability, alteration of articles, board resolutions, valuation, and related conduct were not properly examined or were dealt with in brief conclusions. The court emphasised that such proceedings require transparent, reasoned, and issue-responsive decision-making, especially where the forum exercises wide powers but must remain within jurisdictional limits. Because the order reflected inadequate reasoning and an incomplete fact-finding exercise, it was set aside and the company petitions were restored for fresh decision on merits. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263840