https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT (CHENNAI) ruled in a case concerning the non-payment of service tax by appellants providing training for security services. Despite paying the tax before adjudication, interest charges under Section 75 were upheld. However, penalties under Section 76 were reduced to Rs. 10,000 due to timely tax payment and lack of intent to evade. The penalty under Section 77 for non-filing of tax returns was affirmed at Rs. 4,000. The Tribunal found the lower authority's order unsustainable due to the absence of a speaking order and disposed of the appeal accordingly. en-us Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT (CHENNAI) ruled in a case concerning the non-payment of service tax by appellants providing training for security services. Despite paying the tax before adjudication, interest charges under Section 75 were upheld. However, penalties under Section 76 were reduced to Rs. 10,000 due to timely tax payment and lack of intent to evade. The penalty under Section 77 for non-filing of tax returns was affirmed at Rs. 4,000. The Tribunal found the lower authority's order unsustainable due to the absence of a speaking order and disposed of the appeal accordingly. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203