<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 487 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263819</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, reducing the additions related to unexplained cash deposits and unexplained fixed deposits. However, the decision on unaccounted interest income was upheld. The tribunal stressed the importance of providing substantial evidence to support claims and complying with procedural requirements in financial transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2015 10:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 487 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263819</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, reducing the additions related to unexplained cash deposits and unexplained fixed deposits. However, the decision on unaccounted interest income was upheld. The tribunal stressed the importance of providing substantial evidence to support claims and complying with procedural requirements in financial transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>