<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (11) TMI 86 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173250</link>
    <description>Cotton yarn was treated as part of &quot;cotton textiles&quot; for purposes of the Cotton Textiles (Control) Order, 1948 under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, because legislative usage, tariff treatment and administrative practice consistently included yarn within textile regulation. The price-control notifications were described as valid regulatory measures: the statutory power to secure equitable distribution and fair availability at reasonable prices permitted empirical price fixation based on market conditions and shortage, without a rigid cost-plus formula. The canalisation of yarn distribution through specified channels was likewise justified as a reasonable restriction aimed at preventing hoarding, speculation and profiteering.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 18:25:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (11) TMI 86 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173250</link>
      <description>Cotton yarn was treated as part of &quot;cotton textiles&quot; for purposes of the Cotton Textiles (Control) Order, 1948 under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, because legislative usage, tariff treatment and administrative practice consistently included yarn within textile regulation. The price-control notifications were described as valid regulatory measures: the statutory power to secure equitable distribution and fair availability at reasonable prices permitted empirical price fixation based on market conditions and shortage, without a rigid cost-plus formula. The canalisation of yarn distribution through specified channels was likewise justified as a reasonable restriction aimed at preventing hoarding, speculation and profiteering.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>