<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (10) TMI 65 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173246</link>
    <description>Article 30(1) protects a minority institution only where the minority itself established the educational body, and the Court held that Aligarh Muslim University was created by the 1920 Act rather than by the Muslim minority. As the University was incorporated by statute and placed under statutory control, the minority could not claim minority administration or invalidate the 1951 and 1965 amendments on that ground. Article 26 also failed because the University and its property had vested in the statutory body, not in the minority. The challenges under Articles 14, 19, 25, 29 and 31 likewise failed, and the amendments were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 10:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=396632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (10) TMI 65 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173246</link>
      <description>Article 30(1) protects a minority institution only where the minority itself established the educational body, and the Court held that Aligarh Muslim University was created by the 1920 Act rather than by the Muslim minority. As the University was incorporated by statute and placed under statutory control, the minority could not claim minority administration or invalidate the 1951 and 1965 amendments on that ground. Article 26 also failed because the University and its property had vested in the statutory body, not in the minority. The challenges under Articles 14, 19, 25, 29 and 31 likewise failed, and the amendments were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>