https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199 The appellate court set aside the lower authorities' orders in a case involving a service tax demand and penalty dispute. The court remanded the case to the original authority for re-quantification of the tax demand based on findings that certain payments for technical advice were taxable under the "Consulting Engineer Service" definition. The court rejected arguments against including fees for soil analysis services in the taxable amount. The penalty liability of the assessee was also subject to re-evaluation. Both appeals were allowed for remand, enabling a fresh assessment by the competent authority. en-us Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199 The appellate court set aside the lower authorities' orders in a case involving a service tax demand and penalty dispute. The court remanded the case to the original authority for re-quantification of the tax demand based on findings that certain payments for technical advice were taxable under the "Consulting Engineer Service" definition. The court rejected arguments against including fees for soil analysis services in the taxable amount. The penalty liability of the assessee was also subject to re-evaluation. Both appeals were allowed for remand, enabling a fresh assessment by the competent authority. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199